AN
ANALLYSIS OF STUDENTS’ ERRORS IN ENGLISH NEGATION AT THE 2nd SEMESTER OF THE 7th
CLASS OF SMP PGRI 3
Adenan Damiri
Dosen PNS-Dpk Kopertis Wilayah II
STKIP PGRI Bandar Lampung
Abstrac: In teaching and learning
English as a foreign language. The
students should have the ability in using it in speaking or writing. However to
be able to speak or write well, the
students should have the mastery of
structure. Because if they have lack of structure they will make errors. It is
therefore, the writer would like to analyze the students’ errors in using
English negation. The subject is the
students at the second semester of the
seventh class of SMP PGRI 3 Bandar that consists of 40 students.
In the data collecting technique the writer used essay test writing test, it
means that ask the students to answer based on the teacher’ questions in
written dialogue and in analyzing the data the students was used surface
strategy taxonomy.
Based on the data analyzing
of students’ English negation of their writing dialogue, the writer
described that there are 25 students who
made errors from 40 students= 62.5%. And from 40 students the writer found 440
sentences. From 440 students, there are 199 in correct sentences= 27.04%..
From 199 incorrect sentence or errors, there are 16 sentences
in omission errors= 13.45%; addition
errors is 16 sentences= 13.45%; misformation errors is 81 sentences = 68.06%;
and misordering errors is 6 sentences= 5.04%. Based on kind of errors, it can
be seen that misformation is the highest errors and misordering errors is
lowest error.
Most of the students’ errors
because of the students’ ability
of structure. It means that the students have lack of structure mastery especially
in using auxiliary verb and the using of ‘not’ and also the using tenses.
Key Words: Negation errors, written dialogue,
surface strategy
INTRODUCTION
In international
communication, English has been accepted to be used to many fields of work and
study. English as an international language should be learnt by someone to face
the globalization era because all of thing in the world will be used English
not only for spoken communication or in written communication. It means that language
is considered as a tool of communication and language cannot be separated from
the community, because someone can communicate with each other by using
language as mean of communication.
However, someone
cannot understand what the other people say if he does not know the language
that thy use. He also cannot express his ideas or opinion if he does not know
the language. It means that it is difficult to do all our activities without
language. Someone needs language not only for communication but also for
getting science and technology. It is therefore, the writer thinks that how
important the language in human life.
It is therefore.
English is more and more important in
the world communication. English is widely used in many countries either as a
native language, a second language or foreign language. English is the first
foreign language that must be taught as the compulsory subject starting from
Junior high school, senior high school
up to university or other higher education institutions. It is hoped that the
students are able to write, speak or to read the English books prescribed at
the university. However, students still find some difficulties to speak and
write English well. It can be seen that when the students are asked to answer
the question by using English and they also difficult to give ideas or
opinions. Even thought, the objective of teaching and learning English as
foreign language that the students are able to use the language in
communication. It means that the students who learn a foreign language do not
only learn the grammatical rules but also expected to be able to use language
for communication.
The student who
learn English expected to get four skills, that is: listening, reading,
speaking and writing. As Bose said that :”The main purpose of teaching English
is acquiring by the people of facility in the use of English in situation
demanding a greater degree of control. The facility is the use of English
should then be in speaking, reading and writing, although in each of these
aspects the marks of attainment assumed difficult and distinct dimension
(1979:28).
From theories
and explanation above, it is clear that
in teaching and learning English the students should be given a lot of practice
in using language because by having practices they are going to be more active
and able to speak or write English well. It is also expected that the purpose
of teaching and learning in Indonesia
is the students should have the ability or skillful to communicate either in
spoken or in written English well.
It is therefore
in teaching and learning English, the students should have the ability to
communicate in spoken or written English, however to be able to speak or write
English well, the students should be given the structure. It is hoped that if
the students have the ability of structure, they could use English. It is meant
that the student would more effective to write or speak English based on the
basic structure which they known. If the students understand about the
structure it is hoped that they will be able to speak or write English well.
The
students of foreign language also should realize that the new structure which
may really differ with the structure of their own language. It means that the
student need to acquire the basic frame or structure in order to produce and
comprehend the typical sentence or sentences of language. Because every
language has different rule and also has it own arbitrary system or word to
express the opinion, thinking or idea and the meaning of an object.
Based
on the description above, it is clear that in teaching and learning English as
foreign language, the students have some difficulties to express their idea
whether in speaking or writing. It can be caused by the difference of structure
of the language that they have learnt and their own language structure. In the
other words, the students are quite often stuck on their own language. Because
it is very important to construct certain utterances. If they have the ability
of structure they will be able to speak or write English well. As Wilga Rivers
stated that “ it is quite necessary for the students to be able to arrange his
ideas based on grammatical structure that he was known as the reference, when
the students understand the structure, he will be able to construct new
utterances” (Wilga Rivers,1968:78).
Based on theory
above, it is clear that in using language the students must have the ability of
structure. The students also would like make error if they have not the ability
of structure. Richard stated that “errors are result of lack of knowledge or ruler of the language they
learn. They represent tae indicates of translation come tense”.
(Ricard, 1980:15). This idea means that errors will be made by the students if
they have lack of knowledge of English. They use English but they apply the
structure of their own language. This idea also supported by Corder that
“learner errors provide evidence the apply the structure of their own language.
This idea also supported by Corder that “learner errors provide evidence the
system of language that he is using (i.e. he has learned) at a particular time
at a course… the learner us using some system, through not yet the right
system” (Corder, 1974:12).
Based
on the theory, the waiter thinks that it is very important to analyze the
student’ errors. Because by analyzing the students’ errors, the teacher could
know the students’ English. The writer
only would like to analyze the students’ errors, such as: omission, addition,
misformation, addition and misordering errors in using English negation .
METHOD
This research
will be conducted base on descriptive method. It means that the writer analyzed
the students’ sentence errors in using negative sentence or English
negation based on English structure through writing dialogue. In guide writing dialogue,
the writer give some question based and
the students answer based on teacher’ question in written dialogue form, And analyze kind of errors, such as:
omission, addition, misformation, and misordering errors.
The subject of
the research is the students at the second semester of the seventh
class of SMP PGRI 3 Bandar Lampung that consists of 40 students.
In order to know
the students errors in using negative sentence, the writer would like to use essay test,
that is, ask the students to answer based on the teacher’ question. The writer analyzes the student’s English
negation. and classify into kind of errors such as; omission, addition,
misformation and misordering.
The analyzing
the students errors in using English negation or negative sentence through writing
dialogue, The writer used the following formula:
P = X 100%
Explanation:
P= Presentation of errors
F= The total number of errors
N= The total number of sentences
By looking at the criterion, as
follows:
76% - 100% adalah paling tinggi
(the highest)
56% - 75% adalah lebih tinggi
(higher)
40%- 55% adalah sedang (sufficient)
Less than 40 % is low
(Suharsimi Arikunto, 1987: 196).
RESULT AND DISCUSSION
To be clear to
know how many students who made errors in omission, addition, misformation and
misordering errors, the writer would like to describe or show the following
table:
RESULT
Table: 1 The Quantitative Data Of Students’ Omission,
Addition Misformation And Misordering
Erros In Using English Negation On
Their Writing Dialogue
No.
|
Sample
|
Kind
Of Error
|
ME
|
%
|
|||||
A
|
B
|
C
|
D
|
|
|
||||
1
|
001
|
1
|
1
|
4
|
-
|
6
|
|
||
2
|
002
|
1
|
-
|
3
|
-
|
4
|
|
||
3
|
003
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
0
|
|
||
4
|
004
|
-
|
-
|
1
|
-
|
1
|
|
||
5
|
005
|
1
|
-
|
3
|
1
|
5
|
|
||
6
|
006
|
-
|
-
|
1
|
-
|
1
|
|
||
7
|
007
|
2
|
-
|
2
|
1
|
5
|
|
||
8
|
008
|
-
|
1
|
8
|
-
|
9
|
|
||
9
|
009
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
0
|
|
||
10
|
010
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
0
|
|
||
11
|
011
|
1
|
1
|
2
|
-
|
4
|
|
||
12
|
012
|
-
|
1
|
5
|
-
|
6
|
|
||
13
|
013
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
0
|
|
||
14
|
014
|
2
|
1
|
2
|
-
|
5
|
|
||
15
|
015
|
2
|
-
|
1
|
-
|
3
|
|
||
16
|
016
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
0
|
|
||
17
|
017
|
1
|
-
|
1
|
-
|
2
|
|
||
18
|
018
|
1
|
-
|
5
|
-
|
6
|
|
||
19
|
019
|
1
|
1
|
3
|
1
|
6
|
|
||
20
|
020
|
-
|
2
|
5
|
-
|
7
|
|
||
21
|
021
|
-
|
1
|
4
|
1
|
6
|
|
||
22
|
022
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
0
|
|
||
23
|
023
|
-
|
1
|
2
|
-
|
3
|
|
||
24
|
024
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
0
|
|
||
25
|
025
|
-
|
-
|
4
|
1
|
5
|
|
||
26
|
026
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
0
|
|
||
27
|
027
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
0
|
|
||
28
|
028
|
-
|
1
|
2
|
1
|
4
|
|
||
29
|
029
|
-
|
1
|
1
|
-
|
2
|
|
||
30
|
030
|
-
|
3
|
6
|
-
|
9
|
|
||
31
|
031
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
0
|
|
||
32
|
032
|
1
|
-
|
2
|
-
|
3
|
|
||
33
|
033
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
0
|
|
||
34
|
034
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
0
|
|
||
35
|
035
|
-
|
1
|
6
|
-
|
7
|
|
||
36
|
036
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
0
|
|
||
37
|
037
|
2
|
-
|
5
|
-
|
7
|
|
||
38
|
038
|
-
|
-
|
3
|
-
|
3
|
|
||
39
|
039
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
0
|
|
||
40
|
040
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
0
|
|
||
Jumlah
|
16
|
16
|
81
|
6
|
119
|
|
|||
Source: The data analysis
Rom the table
above, it can be seen that:
1. There are 16
sentences in omission errors from 119 students’ sentences errors. It means that the students’ omission errors is 13.45%.
2 There are 16 sentences in addition
errors from 119 students sentences errors. It means that the students’ omission
errors is 13.45%.
3. There are 81 sentences
in misformation errors from 119 sentences errors. It means that the student who made errors in
misformation is 68.06%,
4. There are 6 sentences in
misordering errors from 119 sentences errors. It means that the students who
made errors in misordering is 5.04%
In this research, the writer also
would like to describe each students who
made errors in using English negation on their guide writing , by seeing the
following table:
Table: 2 The Quantitative Data Of
Each Students’ Errors In Using English Negation On Their Writing Dialogue
No
|
Sample
|
NS
|
NE
|
%
|
1
|
001
|
11
|
6
|
54.54
|
2
|
002
|
11
|
4
|
36.36
|
3
|
003
|
11
|
10
|
0.00
|
4
|
004
|
11
|
1
|
4.09
|
5
|
005
|
11
|
5
|
45.45
|
6
|
006
|
11
|
1
|
9.09
|
7
|
007
|
11
|
5
|
45.45
|
8
|
008
|
11
|
9
|
81.81
|
9
|
009
|
11
|
0
|
0.00
|
10
|
010
|
11
|
0
|
0.00
|
11
|
011
|
11
|
4
|
36.36
|
12
|
012
|
11
|
6
|
54.54
|
13
|
013
|
11
|
0
|
0.00
|
14
|
014
|
11
|
5
|
45.45
|
15
|
015
|
11
|
3
|
27.27
|
16
|
016
|
11
|
0
|
0.00
|
17
|
017
|
11
|
2
|
18.18
|
18
|
018
|
11
|
6
|
54.54
|
19
|
019
|
11
|
6
|
54.54
|
20
|
020
|
11
|
7
|
63.63
|
21
|
021
|
11
|
6
|
54.54
|
22
|
022
|
11
|
0
|
0.00
|
23
|
023
|
11
|
3
|
27.27
|
24
|
024
|
11
|
0
|
0.00
|
25
|
025
|
11
|
5
|
45.45
|
26
|
026
|
11
|
0
|
0.00
|
27
|
027
|
11
|
0
|
0.00
|
28
|
028
|
11
|
4
|
36.36
|
29
|
029
|
11
|
2
|
18.18
|
30
|
030
|
11
|
9
|
81.81
|
31
|
031
|
11
|
0
|
0.00
|
32
|
032
|
11
|
3
|
27.27
|
33
|
033
|
11
|
0
|
0.00
|
34
|
034
|
11
|
0
|
0.00
|
35
|
035
|
11
|
7
|
7.00
|
36
|
036
|
11
|
0
|
0.00
|
37
|
037
|
11
|
10
|
10.00
|
38
|
038
|
11
|
3
|
3.00
|
39
|
039
|
11
|
0
|
0.00
|
40
|
040
|
11
|
0
|
0.00
|
Jumlah
|
440
|
199
|
|
Source: The Data
Analysis
From 440 students’ sentences, there
are 199 sentences errors. It means the students’ sentences errors is 29.75%. It
indicated that the students’ who made sentences errors is low. However from 40 students , the writer found that
there are 15 student who did not make errors . It means that the students who
made errors is 62.5%. It indicated that
the students who made errors is high.
CONCUSION
From the data analyzing of
students’ English negative sentence in their
writing dialogue, the writer
would like to give conclusion as follows:
1. There are 40 students who made sentences in using English negation
on their writing dialogue. From 40 students, the writer found that 440
sentences. From 40 sentences, the writer found that there are 199 incorrect
or sentences errors= 27.04%. It means that the students’ sentences
errors is low . However the students who
made
errors is 25 students fro 40
students= 62.5%. It means the students who made error is high.
2. From 199 students’ sentences
errors, the writer found that there are 16 sentences errors in omission. It
means the students’ omission errors is 13.45%.; there are 16 sentences errors
in addition. It means the students’ addition errors is 13.44%; there are 81 sentences in misformation errors. It mean that the
students who made errors in misformation is 68.06%; and there are 6 sentences
errors in misordering errors. It means that the students who made errors in
misordering is 5.04%. Based on kind of
errors that the students , it indicated that misformation is the highest kind
of errors.
5.2
The Suggestion
Based on the explanation and conclusion above, the
writer would like to give some suggestions as follows
l. For The Students
The students should be given a lot
of practice in using English in spoken or written.
By practicing English, they will be able to
remember and remind the English
sentence, especially in using English negation. The students also should be
motivated to read English text, such as: short story, magazine and newspaper.
2. For The Teacher
The teacher should give more
attention to the students’ Errors,
especially in using English negation It
means that the students should be given a lot of practices in using English negation and the
students also should have the ability of
structure. By mastering the structure, the students are able to reduce or may
not make the errors. Because most of the
students errors are caused by the lack of structure, especially in using
of not., auxiliary verb , and
personal pronoun.
REFFERENCE
Bose, Shanile,1978, Teaching and English a Modern
approach Published by doaba house book sellers and publisher 1688 Naisarok, Delhi, 356 pages.
Bowrn, H. Doglass,1980, Principle of language
Learning,Brintice Hall, Englewood,
261 Pages.
Corder, 1974, Errors Analysis and interlanguage,
Oxford University Press,275 Pages.
Hornby
AS, 1984, Oxpord Advance learner
Dictionary of Current English, Oxpord University Press, New York 1041 page
Littlewood, william, 1980, communicative Language Teaching Cambridge University
Press. London,
144 page
Richard, 1980, Error Analysis and second language
strategies, Inc. John.W. Oller, jr. And Jack C. R icard focus on the leaner,
Newbury house publishing, Toronto,
261 pages
Rivers, Wilga M. 1968. The Psycologies and the
foreign Language Teacher, Washington
Square press, Inc, London, 124 pages
Tidak ada komentar:
Posting Komentar